Now building arcitectural structures, Tilman continues to work through painting issues such as light and colour. We loved sharing the time with him during his 2016 visit to at RAYGUN in Toowoomba.
An insightful read. Happy Weekend xx
Untitled From Dawn to Dusk 2016
Image is from online blog Blouinartinfo
Every March we love to showcase different members of our local Toowoomba art scene. Curated by arts worker Grace Dewer and artist David Usher, they called on 70’s Disco as a surrounding theme. Jam packed to the rafters, RAYGUN was lots of fun and here’s how we do it, 70’s style.
RAYGUN: Talking about Duchamp’s idea of painting without hands, and his approach to thinking about painting, could you explain further how these ideas resonate with conceptual intentions your explore within your own painting practice?
STEPHEN LITTLE: Modernism sought a purer designation for painting’s essential or irreducible being. This led to Greenberg’s ideological push to locate an essentialist imperative for late modernist painting marked by a specific set of criteria for its classification. Duchamp on the other hand preferred to deal with the conventions of language itself that he felt located painting. He had wanted to resist the overriding retinal reading of painting and instead sought an approach that depended on other things, and this in turn formed a passage to the conceptual. The last 100 years has evidenced nothing short of a paradigm shift for painting and art in general, and has led to markedly changed terms of reference for painting.
With this recent history in mind, I set out to explore alternatives to traditional models used in the classification of painting. As one whose studio methodology evidenced a refusal of traditional means, choosing to retain the name ‘Painting’ led to questions about painting’s changed terms of reference. Aside from its role of designating the area of my practice, my use of the nomenclature ‘Painting’ is underscored by a tone of provocation. The provocation lies in the terms continuing resistance to conventional, material and ideologically driven classifications that continue, often inadequately, to establish what may constitute painting today.
The legacy of the readymade, the everyday and conceptualism has led me into the discourse of painting from the outside and has proved pivotal in providing critical distance, and providing methods and strategies that otherwise may not be readily available, or agreeable for some. Strategically, this provided leverage to engage with painting on my own terms and positioned me between painting and what it was deemed ‘not’ to be, i.e. objects such as tents, floor brushes, mirrors etc. The task I gave myself entailed identifying alternative pathways as a means to create new and functional modes of address for the studio work. I acknowledged some of the work at the time as being work about painting i.e. that it references a particular aspect or approach to painting, while others appeared to be more specific in their designation as painting. This in turn, led to questions such as, what values, factors, contingencies or traits determine what painting can be?
Painting continues by being constantly corrupted, by questioning its boundaries, and not limiting itself to its own conventions and ‘traditional’ set of competencies. It has the ability to slide between different physical & perceptual modalities, and is continued and extended by embracing that which might extinguish it. In this, painting is a practice that now incorporates a diverse range of competencies that exist beyond painting’s historic tradition and beyond any prescribed notion of material structure. I view the question ‘how is your work painting?’ as a loaded one as it assumes that we know what painting is or should be, and that I must somehow justify how my work fits into this category. I prefer to return the question as ‘how is it not painting?’ to reveal and challenge an assumed or prescriptive criteria for classification.
RAYGUN: You have incorporated data from NASA and utilizing the accessibility of sending work to Mars in previous projects. Could you please elaborate on why you look beyond your own earthly horizons to integrate into your art practice?
STEPHEN LITTLE: I look beyond my earthly horizons like just about any other artist. Contexts can change from artist to artist and from work to work. Some draw on politics, on humour, on music etc. Art comes from life and reflects life. I feel that sometimes it is important to step outside of ourselves, outside of the here and now. Sometimes this offers the freedom to extend a dialogue, methodologies or processes in ways that may be limited within a particular studio structure or an art for arts sake approach. New bridges can be created, and new narratives and unexpected outcomes realised. New directions can be forged, new problems discovered, and conventions and recourse to the familiar can be overcome. When we take a dialogue into a new context we can view it with fresh eyes, and from many new perspectives.
Last night we joined Stephen Little for the opening of his project RED PLANET. Stephen’s practice is concerned with Modernist Painting and associated attributes including surface, line and colour. His video projection reveals footage recorded from hazard avoidance cameras on NASA’s Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity on the surface of Mars between January 2004 and 2015. In addition to the visual imaging, the sound footage recorded the rover’s negotiation of Mars varied terrain, while the 42.2 kilometer journey reveals a time lapsed mapped line to the right of the screen. Red Colouring software was filtered in sync with the sound scape and in turn the viewer is invited to explore the surface of the rectangular shaped video projection in addition to the landscape beyond a known horizon. These explorations of painting’s possibilities will be further explored through a series of discussions with Stephen, and will be published on the lab during the month of February.
Also during Stephen’s stay with us in Toowoomba he contributed to the REFLEX wall painting project which was ‘officially’ launched after his RAYGUN opening. Check it out.